Showing posts with label Birmingham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Birmingham. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 November 2023

Birmingham Blues


 

I have a similar relationship with Birmingham as does a foster child has with their adopted parents. 

It's complicated.

I always say that I did not become a native Brummie by choice, but was instead assimilated by the city.

My parents moved to Sutton Coldfield when I was 4. Sutton at that time was prosperous independent town on the outskirts of Birmingham, famous for its large parkland and rich residents. A mere 7 years later the town was swallowed into Birmingham to become just another suburb of that metropolis (it was claimed, the idea was to create a block of solid tory councilors on Birmingham city council. If so it failed ). 

The decision still rankles long term Sutton residents to this day. 

The upshot though, was that although technically growing up in Birmingham, I never really felt much connection with that entity known as Brum.

When I was young, going to Birmingham always felt akin to travelling to another country. Exciting, different, but also slightly scary. 

We would take the train to Birmingham New street station and watch through the grimey British rail  diesel windows as the fields gave way to the suburbs and then eventually morphed into a skyline punctuated with tall buildings. 

As enticing gateways to major cities go, New Street station in the 1970's left a lot to be desired. 

Most cities stations are built around large sweeping arches allowing air and light into the otherwise dark, fume filled concourses.  Birmingham New street designers on the other hand would have no truck with that and was instead based the design on WW2 U-Boat pens, burying them deep into rock so that they were always dark, fume filled and claustrophobic 

From the stygian depths of the station you would ride the escalator into the Bull ring shopping center based above the station. The Bull Ring in my youth represented fun with the promise of a visit to Beatties models, or the Hudson book shops just outside. Meanwhile my parents would drag us around the Habitat shop (Think IKEA, but smaller and far more expensive). It was also a labyrinth of passages and dim florescent lighting . Woe betide any child who lost contact with their parents in the age before mobile phones. There were rumours that when it was eventually knocked down, a whole civilization was discovered based around groups of feral adults who had survived on Wimpy burger left overs. 

On really good days we would get to go to the Natural History museum. The price would be listening to my mothers monologue on the pre-Raphaelite movement before we could get to the fun stuff such as a full size model of the T-Rex (with added sound effects). 

To get to the museum meant braving Birmingham's streets. 1970's Birmingham was based around the city planners two overriding loves. 

Firstly the automobile. Birmingham wealth and success was largely based on the motor industry, and the town planners made sure that every accommodation was made to these metal monsters in a way that would make Rishi Sunak weep with joy. Pedestrians were relegated to subterranean passages and overcrowded pavements, mingling with the lead and carbon-monoxide put out by the steel stallions, while the car enjoyed flyovers and wide thoroughfares. Nowhere was this worse than New Street itself, where after exiting the station concourse you were met with a logjam of vehicles.

There was one thing the planners loved move than cars and that was concrete. 60's and 70's Birmingham architects could not get enough of the stuff. Not for them, hiding it behind glass or burying underground. Concrete was to be cherished, displayed, loved and worshipped in brutalist buildings and dystopian public squares. 

The peak of both these obsessions came in the building a vast concrete motorway junction called Spaghetti Junction in the 1970's

The upshot of this was in no way, Birmingham could be considered a attractive city. Not that the residents cared. Beauty was for cities wedded to the past. Birmingham was about the future. It was unashamedly industrial, brash and modernist. 

However even within this sea of cement, there were some oasis's.  As you exited New Street station you were confronted by a building looking like a giant had perched a coke can on its end, atop of New Street station. That was the rotunda building.

Among this concrete conurbation,  the Rotunda building stood out. Firstly in a city designed around square boxes, it was curved. Secondly it was clad in glass rather then concrete. On the few occasions the sun penetrated the car made smog, it gleamed as the sun hit it. To a impressionable child, I always imagined that the building actually rotated, like a giant merry-go-round.  If the New York skyline was defined by the Empire State building, the Rotunda defined Birmingham's and it would have been unimaginable without it

OK, it was no Sydney opera house, but it was all we had to cling onto, in an otherwise dreary landscape and as a small child it was a beacon that represented the excitement of being in a large city. 

Over the years, I moved away from Birmingham and was embarrassed to admit I came from there. The view of most of the country in the 80's and 90's equated Brum with industrial decline. But as I grew older however a combination of nostalgia and experience mellowed me and my stance softened. As  I moved back closer to Birmingham, I started to take my children into Birmingham, as my parents did before me, and a new appreciation grew of the city.

I found, that like me, Birmingham had grown up. Wide pedestrian boulevards had now replaced car infested rat runs. The original Bull Ring had been pulled down, replaced with a new shopping centre based on light and space. The skyline had also changed. The brutalist city had been slowly transformed with new buildings, based not on concrete, but glass and tiles.

In all this change however the constant was still the Rotunda. There had been attempts to demolish it 1980's, that was met with horror by Birmingham residents. It therefore remained as a anchor and constant link between Birmingham of my past and future. 

So when there was an opportunity to climb the building and take photos, I did not delay in buying a ticket


The veritable Verity

The session was led by Verity Milligan. I had known Verity, pre-covid,  from a memorable previous workshops in the peak district, where she managed to arrange both a foggy morning and a cloud inversion on the same day.

Since that time Verity had gained a rightful reputation has a renaissance Birmingham photographer by producing images that cast the city in a new positive light and in doing encouraged other photographers to to re-evaluate Birmingham as a photographic subject.

City residents are often the worst judges of a place positives. Ask virtually any long term incumbent of any British city to point out the photographic beauty spots, and they will generally stare at you like you asked where best to buy real unicorns. 

It was the same with me and Birmingham. Apart from a few places like Sutton park, my formative years has trained me to dismiss any idea of Birmingham as a photographic destination. Verity, coming to the city later in life, did not have that baggage. Add an astute photographic eye, powerful technique and for the last 10 years she has been producing images that presented Birmingham in a new light to  people around the world. 

 

My Inner Don

 As is my wont, I arrived at New Street station far too early. As in my youth,. Although the New Street station platforms are as dreary as ever, the old Bull Ring has changed out of all recognition. Gone is the dark concourses, replaced by a huge polythene bubble letting light into the concourse.

There is also Ozzy the bull. A refugee from the commonwealth games, it now stands proudly in the middle of grand central, as the Bull ring has been renamed. Even this is represented change. I still remember when Birmingham refused to release a relative small amount of money to buy a giant King Kong statue, so it is clear that Birmingham now understands the power of art. 

A load of bull

 

I had some time to kill, so I I headed down to New Street proper to practice a little street photography. 

As I got closer, it was apparent that was in a middle of a huge pro-Gaza demonstration



Cycle for Gaza

Suella's hate marchers

Waiting for the Interfada

Religous fundamentalist - Christian style

 

I had just finished the Don McCullin biography, and I felt enthused to take some social/conflict photography. Fortunately the crowd, though noisy, was well behaved and( despite our present home secretary expressed prejudice) consisted of just ordinary people expressing their feelings about extraordinary events.

However I always feels a sense of unease in these situations.  I always have the feeling the crowd  would at any point, in unison, turn and point at me and my camera like some zombie movie. Realizing I was not cut out to become a conflict photographer, I instead retreated to just outside the Bull Street shopping center, where I practiced taking images of the outside of the Rotunda and passers by.

After about 20 minutes I was accosted by a security guard. 

"You cannot take photos here" said the security guard. 

Now that confused me since I was only 10 yards from the bronze bull which represented the bull ring which at that very moment was being surrounded by families taking selfies and photos. 

Again calling on the spirit of Saint Don, I was not to be put off so easily

"I'm sorry, but where does it say that?" I replied

The Security guard motioned me over to a lamppost, which at the bottom had a small plaque saying "no public right of way" 

"You can take photos there " he said pointing to the place where the German market was being installed, "but not here", motioning towards the bronze bull.

However I was still none the wiser. I knew shopping centers could get very officious about the use of tripods blocking thoroughfares , but this was just me with a camera. I decided to cross-examine

"So does that mean I cannot take photos on my phone?"

He paused for a while, since obviously he was not used to being asked questions

"No that's OK" he replied, "but not with a camera like that , in case you sell the images. For copyright reasons you see"

Apart from underestimating the quality of a modern mobile phone camera and overestimating my abilities, this confused me even more since I had never up to that point considered my images as worth selling. Also I was pretty sure that intent to sell was not covered in copyright law

"But I don't intend to sell them" I replied

"Never the less, we cannot take that chance" he said

I was tempted to continue the conversation. There were myriad arguments that I could use, but in truth I felt sorry for him. No one chooses security guard as a career path, and I doubt he felt it was his job to question the rules handed down to him. After all he was polite, just doing his job, and I'm probably he saw the stupidity of the rule, but had little say in its enforcement. 

So I took pity on him and I packed my camera away and headed to the Rotunda entrance


Big eye view


 

The Rotunda

The entrance to the Rotunda is remarkable hard to find, consisting in a small sliding door set among various shops.  It leads into a long passage to a small unfurnished area where the lifts are.

Our destination was on the very top, the 20th floor which consisted of serviced apartments. Most importantly the rooms at the top floor are the only ones with access to a balcony that circles the entire building

The room itself opened out looking down on New Street station, the grand central plaza. Ahead, Queensway could be seen snaking into the distance. To the right, the new library could just be seen huddled between Birmingham's latest development on Chamberlain Square, while to the right Digbeth church could be seen.

Although the weather was not perfect, with a bank of cloud suggesting a dull sunset ,but at least it was dry. As we stood on the balcony, a biting wind whipped past the building as I and 20 other wannabe photographers stood around with various cameras and tripods, making us submerge into our coats and hats 

The session was organized by Staying Cool At Rotunda and all the proceeds would go to charity. The organisers could not be nicer continually supplying much welcome sustenance in the form hot drinks 

The city laid out for our examination

Rotunda beer as well

The top floor. Like some 1970's sci-fi wannabe

 

Before coming I had thought long and hard about taking a tripod. I don't like tripods because they are heavy and often I end up dragging one around and never using them. Modern OIS system on cameras have reduced the need for them in my mind, but there are still scenarios where a good quality tripod is essential. Also tripods also take up a lot of room, and I was not keen in fighting for space if we were cheek by jowl with other photographers. 

So I compromised. My monopod is light, and has a three splayed feet for increased stability. I hoped it would give me enough with the OIS feature of the camera without the weight penalty of a full tripod. In hindsight, it was probably a mistake, and while I got some sharp images, the extra stability as light got low, especially when bracketing the shots would of made sense

The second thought was what lenses to take. Obviously a wide angle made sense. Apart from my trusty 10-24mm, I had a Samsung 8mm Manual focus. Also it was a good opportunity to try out a Laowa 8mm I had just bought. I was attracted to this, because unlike the Samsung, with its heavy barrel distortion, it advertised as having zero distortion while providing a wider field of view than the 10-24mm. In the end I was not sure which I preferred, the natural no distorted look or the barrel distortion of the 8mm

To go to the full extreme I also brought my my big eye lens. This was a weird converter I picked up in a charity shop and after the initial test has laid unused for a couple of years. It had a very wide field of view, but also created massive distortion and a circular aspect. However I thought it would create some interesting effects.

A port hole onto the city. The city is confined into the fish-eye

 
As are the photographers

After a bit of soul searching, I also decided to add my 150-400mm. My main reasoning was it would be almost full moon, and maybe I could get shots as it came up behind buildings. As it turned out we were on the wrong side. and it was too cloudy. However it did prove useful for picking out features from the general city mayhem

Initially the conditions did not seem hopeful, since a layer of cloud lay across the city, but as the sun went down, enough poked through to illuminate the buildings. As it did the lights came on and the buildings lit up. Verity says she prefers the blue hour, just before it goes dark and the streetlights cast a greenish glare. I am not sure I agree and prefer the dark since it hides things like the AC units that adorn the rooftops, hidden to the people below. However it was fascinating to watch the city change as the lights dimmed.


The Birmingham toy box with a little tilt-shift effect

Hidden in the city are some architectural gems that you miss from the ground level

However my biggest problem, was probably too much time and too little patience. After the 1st 30 minutes I get bored and start playing with ICM, multiple exposure etc. I think this is probably the difference between me and the really good photographers. They have a clarity of objective and are willing to wait until conditions are right, while I will wander off and try something else miss the best shots.

I liked some of the results, and it was a fun evening, made even better by the hosts, Staying Cool, who could not be more accommodating or helpful. 

It was probably the best evening in photography since the pandemic and while I am sure better photos were taken, I was happy with my results


Yes, I admit boredom made me start playing with a few ICM effects like zoom

Grand Central takes off...

I tried to capture the city reaching from the sky....

Enough of the sunset to catch and illuminate the buildings on the skyline

Again the buildings capture the golden sky

Birmingham blues


A little multiple exposure

As the light drops, the street colours come to the fore


And the lighst come on, although plenty of sky colour too







Birmingham at night

and looking out towards Digbeth


 

 



 

 

 

 


Sunday, 9 July 2023

Birmingham, Bruce and Me



"So did you get me one?" 

This was the question I got continually asked when I announced that somehow, I had managed to snag one of the rare Bruce Springsteen tickets for the 2023 Birmingham tour date. 

The answer was always no. 

I had got one, at great cost and the idea of buying two or more just never occurred to me (which was probably a mistake). Even my wife, inquired whether I had included her in my plans. My answer was a) you don't like hanging around stadiums for hours at end and b) You don't like Bruce Springsteen so I never thought about it

Therefore, although I had alienated my friends and family and friends, I had the consolation that after a 38-year hiatus, I had a date with the boss. 

This however left me with two issues. 

Firstly, I had not been to a major concert for about 30 years (Dropping my daughter off to watch Harry Styles does not count).  

My first worry was how do you get to these things nowadays. 

Public transport would be most convenient, but trains in the UK rarely travel past 11, and if they do, I would be fighting with the other 80,000 revellers. So, driving seemed the only alternative, but where would I park and would the car be there when I get back? Also, how early would I need to get there to bag a spot in walking distance? As my family will testify, when travelling anywhere, I tend to assume the worst and leave about 3 days to travel 20 miles just in case of traffic jams, floods, alien invasion etc.

However, I came up with a cunning plan. I asked a friend who lived a mile away from Villa Park, whether I could park outside their house. Then in order to make sure I had a spot, I get there at 9 a.m., spend a day in Birmingham city centre, take the concert bus to the stadium and walk back to the car at the end. 

You can now see why my family hate me making any travel arrangements.

So with transport solved, I came to my second issue. Obviously, I wanted to take photos, but the ticket regulations said that only pocket cameras could be taken, which I assume ruled out my Fuji XT-4 with a 150-400 lens and tripod. I had my Pixel 6a phone, but the seats were quite away from the stage, and I doubted its zoom capabilities would be adequate, so I really needed something small and with a good zoom lens

I then realised I had the perfect thing. My wife's late uncle had given me his entire collection of old compact cameras. I had done a quick review and put them to one side, but they were still usable. Of course, compact cameras are very much yesterday's technology, superseded by mobiles, but one seemed perfect for this. 

The Samsung Galaxy Camera. 

 


 

 

In its day, the Samsung Galaxy camera was cutting edge in compact camera technology, with a powerful zoom lens mated to an android phone body. In another universe it could of shaped the way cameras were made, but a combination of factors meant that mobiles took over as the phone of choice, so it never took off.

But that raised an intriguing question. Could a dedicated 10 year old camera compete with a modern phone camera ?

This seemed a great opportunity to find out and at the same time explore the differences between phone cameras and dedicated devices, so I decided to take both round Birmingham and the concert to compare the results

First let's meet the competitors...

The Contenders

In the blue corner:-

The Samsung Galaxy Camera


Released in 2012, it boasts a 1/2.3" 16.3 Megapixel BSI CMOS sensorm supported by optical image stabilisation. 

The camera allows speeds between 16 to 1/2000th of a second and has a ISO range of 100 to 3200

The lens provides a 21x optical zoom between a focal length of 4.1 to 86.1 mm (23-481mm equivalent full frame focal length), and has an aperture range from F2.8-5.9

The camera has a 4.8" (122 mm) LCD touch screen with a resolution 1280 x 720 pixels

The camera supports  video 1080p 30 fps video capture, 120 fps slow-motion mode 

The camera OS is based on Android 4.1 'Jelly Bean' operating system running on 1.4 GHz Quad-core processor. It has a dedicated Camera interface and will support apps like snapseed for simple photo processing. It supports WiFi, but not mobile network access.  

Photos are stored on a SD card or 8GB internal memory. There is no RAW support

The camera has an integral pop up flash, which must be manually raised before use.

The camera measures 70.8x128.7 x19.1mm, and weighs a 300g without battery, which is removable. Power on from off is about 30 seconds, to 2 seconds from standby

In the red corner:-

The Google Pixel 6A 


 

Released in 2021 it supports two rear cameras, a 12.2 Megapixel 1/2.55" wide camera with OIS and a 12 Megapixel ultra-wide camera.

The wide camera has a focal length 14 mm (24mm Full Frame equivalent) and a fixed f 1.7 Aperture  , while the ultra-wide has a focal length of 17mm (16mm Full frame equivelent) with a fixed f2.2 Aperture.

The camera has a shutter speed range from  1/37000 to 8.3 seconds and a ISO range from 44 to 11,300,000

The pixel does support a 2x digital zoom function, but has no optical zoom.

The screen is a 6.1 in (150 mm) 1080p OLED screen with 2400 × 1080 px resolution.

The phones runs the very latest Android OS (13) on two  Octa-core 2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 processors. The camera interface is the standard Google Pixel camera app, offering  nightshot, portrait ,panorama modes, but a limited set of camera customization. The latest google camera app claims it has the latest A.I technology for photo sharpening and noise reduction.

The phone has 128Gb of internal storage, but this cannot be expanded. However, it supports mobile networks, so images can be offloaded to online storage on any 4G network. 

The phone can capture video at 4K at 30 or 60fps and 1080p video at 30, 60, 120 or 240fps

The phone measures 52.2 mm (5.99 in) x 71.8 mm (2.83 in) and weighs 178 grams 

The Test

The first test was a wonder around the heart of my home city, Birmingham. As a kid, Brum was a byword for ugly architecture, wrapped up in a ribbon of excessive roads and traffic. Those days are long gone. 

Modern Birmingham has redesigned itself and continues to extinguish the last vestiges of 1960's concrete slabs. Nowhere is this more self-evident than Centenary Square, which contains one of UK's best libraries and some very photogenic scenes. Over the years it has undergone considerable redevelopment

Because I had a lot of time to kill, I decided to set base camp in the library and use it to explore the area.The great thing about the library is its free, has charging points for phones, and great views over the city from various galleries. 

It was a lovely day in Birmingham, with bright blue skies. The sort of day that even a half decent camera will get great images with. Both devices gave good images. If I were picky, I felt the colours on the Samsung were stronger, but both gave usable results.



 

I did have a few issues with the Samsung, however. It was the first time I had really used it, so the controls were unclear. In bright sunlight, the screen was not always easy to read, and without any physical controls apart from the shutter, zoom control and power, it was sometimes difficult to see what I was doing. 

Saying that, when I could see it, the Samsung camera user interface was very impressive, with great use of graphics to set everything from shutter speed to aperture. In contrast, one of the big weaknesses of all android cameras is that they give very little control over the camera settings. If you dig deep enough, you may find a few like shutter speed, but it is clear that android phones cameras are designed for minimal customization, which is generally an anathema to any serious photographer.

My main issue with the  Samsung though was putting it in standby mode. The pixel was always ready at the double click on the on button. The Samsung however, due to the large lens size needed to be placed in standby when not in use and I could not always get it move from standby, sometimes requiring a full power cycle. Even when it did work switching between standby to on took about 3 seconds, which felt like an eternity compared to the phone.

Focal Lengths

One of the big differences between the Pixe3l and Samsung was the available focal length. 

A bit of an admission here. I bought the Pixel 6A due to its ability to take long exposure images, only to find only the Pixel 6 had that ability (This was not which not well documented). This hurt for a while, but it was ameliorated somewhat by the wide camera mode. I really love the ultra wide focal length and 90% of my images are taken with it. 

The Samsung focal length, although longer, is not as wide and for I found it hard to get all the scenes in with architectural shots. Nor can it do panoramas, which are really easy on the phone

 


While I found the Samsung shortest focal length a little on the short side, the longest was perfect for isolating elements of the building skyline. . On the other had, the Pixel camera digital zoom I found relatively unusable since you get a heavy drop in quality.


The concert

While fun, Birmingham city center in bright sunlight was not going to test either camera greatly, therefore enough the the support act, to the main event.

The concert was to be held at Villa Park, a place despite my long years living in Birmingham, I had never visited. 

 


As is my way, I arrived far too early, and wondered onto the pitch. It was only after an hour I realised I had somehow avoided the stewards and was in fact not meant to be on the pitch, since I did not have the correct tickets, as everyone else had arm bands on. I therefore had a dilemma. I could hide in the crowd and get a better view of the concert, or go and take my seat. The 20-year-old me would of probably taken the former option, but I was tired, older, and therefore sneaking past the stewards again (it was that easy) I took my seat.

I did try a few shots of the audience. I am not a very confident street/social photographer, and generally hide behind a long lens to try and remain unobtrusive. In some ways it is easier with a phone since no one bats an eyelid when people take phone images, while you are considered the anti-Christ if you try the same with a full camera. To be honest the form factor of the Samsung is close enough to be mistaken for a phone, however I took advantage of the long lens allowed me to pick out individuals from high in the stands

 

 



 

However the phones panorama mode allowed easy capture of the entire stadium

A Villa Panoroma

Then at 7 O'Clock the concert started. Being summer it meant that the light was still good. The irony of modern concerts is that you pay a lot, then end up so far away from the stage that the act is a tiny figure, and you can only view them via the giant video screens. To be honest they might as well as been in Norway, but obviously we go for the shared experience. 

I also still remember the day when you were frisked to make sure you bought no cameras in. Now everyone has a camera and spend their time using it to take images, recordings and selfies. So, would my Samsung super zoom trump these? 

The short answer was yes. Although some of the images initially were under-exposed, probably due to the bright sky, the longer lens gave the ability to get shots, that would have been impossible with the Pixel.

 If I had more of chance to play with the Samsung, I may have been better in getting the exposure better, such as switching to spot metering. It should also be noted that at least I had those options on the Samsung, while the Pixel provided virtually none. However, with both I missed a viewfinder and histogram display








However there were limits with the long zoom. The first is that with the phone form factor, it is really hard to hold steady. Also without a dedicated view finder, holding the camera at arms length and with full magnification, it was hard to frame the picture. This shows the limitations of such an extreme magnification on such a small body, making it pretty well useless for wildlife photography. Even when we did get a shot, the sensor limitations started to kick in, as shown below, where the image started to break apart at maximum magnification and much detail is lost.

 

So what about the Pixel? Well initially I thought the images were as good, if not better than the Samsung. Certainly they had better dynamic range capturing sky and crowd. However closer examination showed a certain artificiality to them, like they had been oversharpened




 This got even worse when we tried to zoom in using the digital zoom.

A surrealist image

The reason for this is that to compensate for the small lens, the Pixel uses so called "AI" to sharpen the images. Generally they look fine, until compared to cameras with bigger lenses etc. The shot above shows that whatever the hype, there are limits to this.

Video

For a longtime I was dismissive of video, but I have now started including it more into my work. It is difficult to show the differences on the blog, but I have put a video together with some of the photos and concert videos taken.

A longer youtube video compilation

Video

My initial impression is that the Pixel out performs the Samsung in video. This is no a great surprise with the phone taking advantage of its greater processing power to support higher resolution modes.


Final Thoughts and conclusion?

 

When I started this, I assumed the Pixel phone would win hands down. After all the pixel phone camera has the benefit of 10 years of development, masses of processing power, and vastly improved sensor technology.

However, the results are far closer than I expected and even after a decade the Samsung galaxy camera still produces great images in the right situations.

So, let’s start with the good. Despite the promises and advertising, the Samsung camera shows there is no substitute for a good lens. Computational photography techniques continually promise to overcome the limitations of physics, and often they do a good job, so as adding bokeh in portraits, but they will only take you so far. It is only when you hold two images next to each other, you see the A.I generated one to be inferior.

Secondly the Samsung camera interface is superb. I wish there was a phone (and to be honest some camera's) which had a UI as half as impressive. It is clear, obvious and provides a great user experience. The problem with the general android experience is that it caters for the masses. Any attempt to fine tune your image is doomed by the lack on control of the camera hardware itself

Next the not so good. Although the Samsung camera offered 21x zoom, to be honest it was too long. Using such a long zoom on a small form factor is virtually unusable in both handling and results and would of preferred a wider focal length with a shorter zoom. Also, the camera did not offer some of the facilities we expect such a panorama mode and DNG raw.

Finally, then the ugly. The on from standby times were slow and really needed a better on/off switch. For a device that depended on the screen for use, it really was not bright enough in strong light. 

The Samsung Camera phone cost a surprisingly low £500 in 2011 (~ £650 today). With high-end mobiles $ 1000 and above, it still feels good value and a surprisingly modern and capable camera. However, with a mobile phone camera, you are not only getting a capable camera, but a phone, social media access, wallet, maps etc. 

This defines the problem, and while such devices fell out of fashion. However capable it is, it still requires you to carry two devices when only one will generally be OK. The Samsung camera is a great example of when being best sometimes does not beat being just good enough, which is a pity since phone manufacturers could learn a lot from it about making mobile phones more than snapping machines and actual devices that photographers can use.

Here are some other images taken during the day...